Photopea vs Photoshop: A Game-Changing Alternative for Web Design Studios

In today’s fast-paced digital design world, finding cost-effective alternatives to industry-standard software isn’t just about saving money—it’s about smart business decisions. As a web design studio managing multiple licenses, we’ve made a breakthrough discovery that could revolutionise our workflow and significantly reduce our operational costs, Photopea vs Photoshop.

The Cost Comparison

Let’s talk numbers first, because they’re staggering:

• Adobe Photoshop (6 licenses): £3,000+ per year
• Photopea (5 licenses): Approximately £120 per year
• Potential annual savings: £2,880

Real-World Testing of Photopea vs Photoshop

We recently conducted a direct comparison between Photoshop and Photopea for our latest design project. The results were surprising, to say the least. In some aspects, Photopea actually outperformed its more expensive competitor. For instance, the outer glow effect in Photopea produced superior results compared to Photoshop—a feature we frequently use in our design work.

The GIMP Factor

Like many studios seeking alternatives, we previously explored GIMP as a potential solution, particularly attractive due to its compatibility with Ubuntu systems. However, our team struggled to adapt to GIMP’s interface and workflow. Photopea, by contrast, offers a familiar environment that allows for a seamless transition from Photoshop.

Security Considerations

As a web design studio handling sensitive client data, security is paramount, so we do a lot of design and written code work on Linux/Ubuntu, where Photoshop doesn’t work. Photopea‘s web-based platform initially raised questions, but its local processing approach—where files never leave your device—provides robust security while maintaining professional-grade functionality.

Key Advantages of Photopea vs Photoshop

1. Cost-Effective: Dramatic reduction in software licensing expenses
2. Familiar Interface: Minimal learning curve for Photoshop users
3. Superior Features: Some effects, like outer glow, surpass Photoshop
4. Accessibility: Web-based platform means access from anywhere
5. Team-Friendly: Affordable multi-user licensing

Making the Switch

For design studios considering the switch, here’s what you need to know:

• We used the free version in this test (but have signed up for 5 licences)
• Transition period is minimal due to familiar interface
• No compromise on quality for standard web design tasks
• Significant cost savings can be reinvested in other areas of the business
• Team adoption is straightforward due to similar workflow patterns

The Verdict

While Photoshop has long been the industry standard, Photopea represents a viable, professional-grade alternative that doesn’t just save money—it delivers comparable and sometimes superior results. For web design studios looking to optimise their operations without compromising on quality, Photopea offers a compelling solution.

Looking Forward

As software costs continue to rise, testing Photopea vs Photoshop isn’t just about saving money—it’s about smart business adaptation. With the significant savings possible, studios can reinvest in other areas of their business while maintaining professional standards. This in turn saves money for our clients too, a whopping £3,000 we have saved already and it’s only January!

Time to talk design? Contact us today.